Haven't had too many games in her, but I think Zieten is definitely underrated. While her turret arrangement seems awkward at first glance, the rear turret is 360 and has exceptional arcs of fire (you can be angled 20 degrees from straight bow on and still get it firing) so really, compared to Bismarck, you're probably coming ahead if you ever are forced to angle aggressively. Then the gap between secondary range and concealment has gotten much smaller. The mere 0.1 sigma drop in exchange for BC dispersion is more than worth it, it feels pretty noticeably more accurate than Bismarck or FdG. Zieten on the other hand is definitely squishier tier for tier, but the guns have pen that aren't far off from FdG's 406s and have a very nice 22.5s reload. Secondary DPM is actually worse than Gneisenau's, and both of them suffer from pretty rough 9.5km range with 13km+ concealment. 30 second reload also makes the poor RNG even worse. Not to mention being stuck with pen that's basically on par with Odin occasionally getting uptiered to T9 is rough. I felt like 1.6 sigma on Mackensen vs 1.8 on Bayern with better base dispersion was more or less a wash, but the 0.3 sigma drop from Gneisenau to Heinrich is too much of a gap for the base dispersion to counteract, my guns felt very inconsistent. ![]() I don't know, I'm actually enjoying the Zieten more than the Prinz Heinrich. Relative to the others though, sure, it's not *as* good. Just cause it looks like a pyramid doesn't mean the secondaries and the actual guns aren't good :D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |